Crypto Liquidity

For Forks Sake… Functionality Re-engineered

Next time you’re twirling your spaghetti, take a beat to think of another utensil, the crypto fork. In this Coin Chronicles post, we’re exploring the forking world, with a sprinkle of cheese on top. So, grab your parmesan and let’s go.

 

 

Forks: More Than Just Utensils

In the culinary world, forks help you navigate your salad and avoid any dodgy bits. In crypto, they chart the path of a blockchain. It’s kind of like an update. But instead of “Have you tried turning it off and on again?”, in crypto, we just say, “Let’s fork it!”

 

There are two types of forks: Soft & Hard

 

 

Soft Forks: The Diet Version

 

Think of soft forks as switching from regular to coke zero. They’re backward-compatible. If you’re still sipping on the full sugar version, you can still mingle with the zero enthusiasts. But to really savour the new recipe, you’ll want to upgrade your can (plus your waistline will thank you).

 

Hard Forks: The Whole New Recipe

 

A hard fork, on the other hand, is like your favourite cafe suddenly splitting into two because of a heated debate on soy or almond milk. They can’t do both. You now have two cafes, each swearing by their own recipe. Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash? The latte feud of the crypto world.

 

Planned vs. Spontaneous Forks

 

Planned Forks

Sometimes, forks are planned by the community and are integrated smoothly. These are generally updates to improve scalability, security, or add features. In these cases, there is usually consensus (or near-consensus) among stakeholders.

Contentious / Spontaneous Forks

When there is significant disagreement within the community about the proposed changes, a fork can become contentious. This can lead to a split, creating two competing cryptocurrencies, each supported by a faction of the original community.

 

 

 

2016 – Ethereum gets Forked Up

 

An example of forking happened in In 2016, where the Ethereum community faced a significant decision following the exploitation of a vulnerability in the DAO (Decentralized Autonomous Organization). This event led to the theft of a large amount of Ether, and to counteract this, the Ethereum community decided to roll back the blockchain to a point before the hack, essentially erasing it.

 

However, not everyone agreed with this decision. Those in disagreement continued on the original Ethereum blockchain. This led to a split: Ethereum (ETH) and Ethereum Classic (ETC). While ETH was the chain where the DAO theft was nullified, ETC continued as if the hack remained.

 

In simple terms: Think of Ethereum like a game where a big error occurred. Some players decided to “reset” the game to fix the mistake, while others chose to keep playing without making corrections. This “reset” created two separate games (or versions) from the original one.

 

Fast forward to 2023 and we all know that Ethereum has emerged as the standout player. With stronger community backing, higher adoption rates, and more extensive project development, ETH overshadowed ETC, in terms of market influence and value.

 

Forking, as demonstrated by the Ethereum saga, isn’t merely a technical split. It’s a reflection of a community’s values, beliefs, and collective choices. Though Ethereum might have taken the crown in this specific “matchup,” each fork paints a vivid picture of progress, debate, and the dynamic tapestry of the cryptocurrency landscape. Here’s to the forks in the road and may they not get us too bent out of shape.

 

–CoinChronicles

Related Blogs

How the 2024 U.S. Election Could Shape the Future of Market Making

As the U.S. gears up for another presidential election, the stakes are particularly high for the cryptocurrency industry. With regulatory scrutiny intensifying and debates over the digital economy becoming central to policy discussions, the outcome of this election could heavily influence the trajectory of crypto assets and, by extension, market-making strategies.   1. Regulatory Implications… Continue reading How the 2024 U.S. Election Could Shape the Future of Market Making